The Renewable Fuels Association launched their newest online venture today - Choose Ethanol.
The new website features a section dedicated exclusively to E85, plus a news center and quick facts. You can sign up to stay informed about the ethanol discussion as well as follow RFA on twitter, facebook, youtube and flickr.
This is a great place to point not only those who have basic questions about ethanol as a motor fuel, but also those who wish to delve deeper into what ethanol can do for the country, like how ethanol can improve national security.
Be sure to spread the word about this site. It’s great resource that will surely develop as the go-to place for up to the minute information on ethanol.
Radio Iowa had this story late last week:
A new study published by the “Ethanol Across America” group says that production and use of ethanol is not causing the deforestation of rainforests. The study suggests that deforestation is more likely the result of cattle production.
Sneller (head of Ethanol Board in Nebraska) says it’s evident there’s very little deforestation taking place and what little tree-cutting is happening is typically related to the use of grassland and forests for cattle production and to a limited extent, for soybeans. In Brazil, for example, that deforestation is done mostly for human uses of the land, rather than fuels.
Sneller continues to say that ethanol production is improving and that the fuel is much better for the environment than petroleum.
He says, “The new report is one that reaffirms what we’ve heard from the University of Nebraska and others that ethanol, particularly made in today’s plants with the newest technology, makes a significant contribution to greenhouse gas reductions, particularly relative to refined gasoline products.” Supporters say ethanol is becoming more efficient and economical to produce, while oil will become more expensive and continue to do environmental damage.
Land-use change is a complex issue and will continue to be studied for years to come. Studies like this bring us closer to the truth.
According to the Detroit News, Dow Chemical announced yesterday plans to build a biorefinery that would use
algae to convert carbon dioxide into ethanol fuel.
The company hopes to replace carbon dioxide in common plastic products like milk jugs if the technology is successful.
Through a partnership with Algenol Biofuels — a startup in Bonita Springs, Fla. — Dow hopes to create a breakthrough process to produce ethanol, a building block for other chemicals. Ethanol is a key ingredient in polyethylene, the most widely used of all plastics, which is found in everyday products, from food packaging to pipes. The chemical also is used in runway deicers, polyester for textiles, and paints.
The move could have significant implications for Detroit’s automakers, according to Algenol Chief Executive Paul Woods. Woods said he already has met with representatives from Ford Motor Co. to discuss manufacturing more vehicles that would use ethanol. The algae-generated ethanol is compatible with technology in use.
The article goes on to mention that the algae-based fuel’s price would be more consistent, selling for $1 per gallon.
Speaking about ethanol, Algenol Chief Executive Paul Woods said “if we can produce a gallon cheaper than any foreign producer, it’s enough to eliminate OPEC producers. We want a low, long-term, stable price that the consumer can rely on.”
Sounds like a job for ethanol.
The NYTimes transportation blog Wheels took on ethanol this weekend with a post about Energy Secretary Chu’s comments on ethanol last week.
In a speech in Des Moines this week, Mr. Chu said, “I’ve been told it costs about $100 in gaskets and fuel lines to turn a car so that it can go all the way to E85.”
The problem with that, the blog continues, is not with E85 compatible cars, but with lacking infrastructure and filling stations to fill the demand.
Asked about Mr. Chu’s comments, Scott Tobin, a vehicle line director for Ford, said, “E85 is something we know how to do, and the technology for it is well developed. It’s a direction the industry can take, but ethanol presently lacks infrastructure and consumer demand. If there is a breakthrough in cellulosic ethanol development, that might change the equation.”
The 2,000th ethanol station opened at the end of May in Miami. Ethanol is indeed spreading across the country and more stations are set to open in the coming months.
If the infrastructure was in place, would you be more likely to purchase a flex-fuel vehicle? Leave your thoughts in the comments.
In an interview with farmer Brent Porteus, past president of the Ohio Corn Growers Association, Daily Finance discusses the corn market and “prospects for the future”.
When asked how ethanol impacted his farming operation in the past year, Porteus has this to say:
“The impact of ethanol is not as great as many people believe. It’s still only a part of the market — last year, three billion bushels. Sixty percent of our corn production is used to feed livestock, while over two billion bushes went to export last year, up 6 percent. Last summer, China was buying commodities, since they were a bargain due to the weak dollar. The spike in grain prices occurred when oil prices went up and the stock market declined, and money looking for a safe haven flowed into commodities. This ‘perfect storm’ was what drove prices up steeply for a couple of months. It wasn’t a corn problem; it was an energy problem.”
As for the food vs fuel debate, he believes that this country’s farmers will be able to renewable fuel and feed the country at the same time:
Porteus points to the dramatic increase in our nation’s yield per acre over the past 30 years. In 1978, the U.S. corn harvest was about 6.3 billion bushels; in 2008, 12.1 billion. He believes that, with new planting technology and improvements in the corn stock, farmers will be able to increase their yields to serve the ethanol industry without driving up food prices. Also, as the USDA points out, only 19 percent of our food cost comes from the cost of grains and seed oils.