Farm Foundation hosted another segment in their “Transition To A Bio Economy” conference series this week in Washington DC, focusing this time on “Global Trade and Policy Issues.”
The conference considered biofuels from a global perspective with participation from the European Union and Brazil. There were a number of very interesting presentations made at the conference, but here is just a sampling:
David Zilberman with the University of California-Berkeley, has created a model to show how ethanol is impacting the price of oil. His model shows that by increasing the supply of fuel with ethanol you reduce OPEC’s ability to make money. Even better, he says our ethanol production has raised the price of fuel in OPEC’s own countries while lowering it for everyone else around the world.
Listen to an interview with David by Chuck Zimmerman of Domestic Fuel here:
Laurent Javaudin, Delegation of the European Commission to the United States, spoke about the impacts of EU mandates for renewable energy. He says the EU is looking at requiring alternative energy sources like biofuels be a percentage of the fuel consumed and achieve it by 2020 and they expect these fuels to obtain at least a 35 percent decrease in greenhouse gas emissions. He adds that the EU mandate is still a work in progress and they hope to have it agreed to by the second quarter of 2010.
You can listen to Chuck’s interview with Laurent here:
Finally, Joel Velasco with the Brazilian Sugarcane Industry Association, told the conference that because they have broken the oil monopoly in Brazil so that they consume more ethanol than gasoline, they no longer have gas stations, they have “fuel” stations. In addition, 90 percent of the new cars sold in Brazil today are flex-fuel. However, Velasco says price is the key to the development and use of ethanol and today ethanol is half the price of gas in Brazil.
You can listen to Chuck’s interview with Joel here:
See more stories from the Farm Foundation conference here on Domestic Fuel.
Corn Plus General Manager Keith Kor tells AgWeek today that his ethanol plant in Winnebago, MN is considering using the city’s wastewater in their production process.
So Corn Plus General Manager Keith Kor talked to Winnebago officials about exploring the possibility of diverting the city’s wastewater from the river to the ethanol plant.
“They really liked the idea, so I made a few phone calls,” Kor said.The calls included state lawmakers who represent Winnebago — Sen. Julie Rosen and Rep. Bob Gunther, both Fairmont Republicans who are sponsoring state legislation to finance the cost of a pipe running from the wastewater facility to the ethanol plant.
While ethanol production is becoming more efficient as technology improves, environmental groups are still critical of the amount of water some ethanol plants consume.
Already, Corn Plus has reduced its ratio to three gallons of water for each gallon of ethanol produced.
“We’d like to get that at least down to two or even a one-to-one ratio,” he said.
When looking at ground-water usage, the ratio could potentially drop close to zero if Corn Plus is able to rely almost exclusively on wastewater from the toilets, bathtubs and sink drains of Winnebago.
There’s more analysis to do about the quality of the water coming from the Winnebago treatment plant and how much additional treatment might be required, but Kor is optimistic.“
Our water engineer took some samples, and preliminary indications look like it will work,” he said.
The United States has become much more environmentally conscious in the past several years, and the reuse of water that would otherwise be drained back into the river is a win-win situation for everyone. This is a great idea!
Wired.com posted a new story this morning about the current state of the ethanol industry, and the differences in development between corn and cellulosic ethanol.
Trouble is, no one in the U.S. has been able to produce cellulosic ethanol in mass quantities at a cost that can compete with corn ethanol. The Department of Energy says cellulosic ethanol costs almost twice as much to produce, and everything from a lack of venture capital to a lack of resources has plagued the industry despite President Obama’s $25 million support for “next generation biofuels-fuels.” Hence the cellulosic industry’s support for boosting the amount of so-called “first generation” ethanol in gasoline.
“While cellulosic ethanol is still in its developmental stages we should do everything we can to help corn-based ethanol meet the renewable fuels standard,” David Aldous, CEO of cellulosic ethanol producer Range Fuels, told Wired.com. “Corn-based ethanol fuel production will soon be capped and the Renewable Fuels Standard will favor cellulosic ethanol. This will add value to cellulosic ethanol fuel and create added interest.”
The article stresses that cellulosic ethanol cannot develop without more growth in the corn ethanol industry first.
“In order to have a second generation of ethanol fuel, you have to have a first generation,” Bob Dinneen, CEO of the Renewable Fuels Association, told Wired.com. “I assure you that corn-based ethanol will not serve as a barrier to the success of cellulosic ethanol. But it must also be understood that while the two fuels are dependent on one another, they are also on two different tracks to success.”
Scientists, senators, cellulosic ethanol producers, agriculture groups and even retired army and intelligence officers are among the many voices of reason that have been sounding off recently against using unproven calculations for indirect land use to determine the future use of renewable fuels.
In this edition of the “Ethanol Report” podcast, we discuss the critical decisions being made regarding renewable fuels and indirect land use on both the federal and state level. Comments are from Renewable Fuels Association Vice President of Research Geoff Cooper, Air Improvement Resource, Inc. President Tom Darlington and Nathanael Greene, Senior Policy Analyst with the Natural Resources Defense Council.
Read Darlington’s report on Land Use Effects of U.S. Corn-Based Ethanol here.
You can listen to “The Ethanol Report” on-line here:
Or you can subscribe to this podcast by following this link.
Chuck Woodside, CEO of KAAPA Ethanol in Minden, Nebraska, has written an op-ed that appeared in the Omaha World-Herald yesterday.
Chuck wrote about the attacks on corn ethanol, noting that there is “scarcely a kernel of truth in any of them.”
Their fundamental flaw is underestimating the ingenuity of the American ethanol industry — and American agriculture as well. Both are becoming more technologically advanced and more efficient in every way, including their use of energy, water and land.
He even addresses those critics who support the “food vs fuel” false debate.
The fact is that food prices continued to rise while agricultural commodity prices plunged and ethanol production grew. This suggests that grain and other farm products play relatively minor roles in retail food prices.
When it comes to the nation’s energy, environmental and agricultural needs, ethanol isn’t part of the problem. It is part of the solution to every challenge. The nation need not choose between clean domestic energy sources and plentiful and affordable food, or between creating green jobs and protecting the natural environment.