Many Republican ethanol supporters were shocked when the party adopted a platform at the convention last week stating that the “U.S. government should end mandates for ethanol and let the free market work.”
That line which was included in the agriculture section of the platform reportedly ended up in there because the hurricane-shortened start to the convention scuttled any debate on the planks. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) told reporters in a conference call that it was his understanding the “platform was presented and voted up and down without discussion and ethanol was not discussed separately.”
However, it does clearly reflect John McCain’s energy plan called the Lexington Project, that would involve eliminating “mandates, subsidies, tariffs and price supports that focus exclusively on corn-based ethanol.”
The ethanol industry and Republican politicians have expressed disappointment and concern over the wording in the platform. Among those who have spoken out against the plank are Senator John Thune (R-SD), the Republican governors of Nebraska and South Dakota, Iowa Agriculture Secretary Bill Northey, agricultural organizations such as the National Corn Growers Association, the American Farm Bureau Federation, and the National Farmers Union, as well as the major ethanol organizations and producers.
It has left many wondering what they will do at the voting booth in November. Although the Democratic party platform says nothing about ethanol specifically, Senator Obama has stressed his support for the alternative fuel and for the Renewable Fuels Standard. While Republican supporters and party analysts have downplayed the platform plank as “pro-free-market” rather than anti-ethanol, it is still causing concern for the industry which believes the RFS is critical for continuing to work ethanol into the domestic fuel supply.
As Matt Hartwig with the Renewable Fuels Association says, a free market in energy simply doesn’t exist. “What we are trying to do in this country is fundamentally change a century of institutional memory,” Hartwig said during an interview at the AgNite celebration in Minneapolis on the second day of the convention. “We use oil in everything that we do and those interests are very well entrenched and do not want to give up their market share. There is absolutely a role for the federal government to play in partnering with a domestic renewable fuels industry.”
With ethanol continuing to be such a political issue, it was especially important this election year for the ethanol industry to have a clear presence at both recent political conventions. In this Ethanol Report podcast, Matt Hartwig with the Renewable Fuels Association and Randy Doyle with Al-Corn Clean Fuels in Claremont, MN discuss how and why the ethanol industry was involved in the Democratic and Republican conventions and the AgNite event at the RNC.
You can listen to “The Ethanol Report” on-line here:
Or you can subscribe to this podcast by following this link.
Dave Vander Griend, CEO of ethanol producer ICM (based in Colwich, KS), has a fantastic op-ed published in the Kansas City Star today.
Vander Griend begins with talking about the recent manufactured “food or fuel” argument.
In the past, the ethanol industry has been blamed for high food prices and environmental damage.
Last month, the EPA along with several major universities corrected those misconceptions, stating that ethanol is not the root cause for higher grocery prices. In fact, corn prices have recently fallen sharply despite increased ethanol production.
He then goes on to discuss a specific plan ICM has with a local gas station.
At TJ Convenience, a mom-and-pop store in Colwich, ICM is kick-starting a program that demonstrates how important ethanol is — to consumers, to agriculture, to the environment and to our nation’s security.
At the station, we use special blender pumps to mix fuel on demand to create blends ranging from 10 to 85 percent ethanol. We’ve priced E-10 5 cents below unleaded, and higher percentages of ethanol-enriched fuel are discounted to reflect the subsidy as well as the percentage of ethanol.
The piece wraps up with a discussion of ethanol’s merits.
Many incorrectly believe that using corn to make fuel means taking food from people’s mouths. Ethanol production merely removes the starch from the corn. Protein and oil are processed into distillers grains, a nutritious livestock feed marketed to feedlots at a price that reduces their feeding cost. Additionally, ICM is perfecting a process that creates additional food-grade products, allowing the most nutritious parts of the corn to remain in the human food supply chain.
It is important for consumers to know that ethanol is environmentally friendly too. The United States Geological Survey says it takes 1,851 gallons of water to extract, transport and refine one barrel of oil or 28 gallons of gasoline, compared with three gallons of water to produce one gallon of ethanol from non-irrigated corn.
If you could sum up the Minnesota Agri-Growth Council’s AgNite event held Tuesday in the Twin Cities in one word, it would have to be the overused “awesome.” Everything was awesome from the venue and the crowd, to the refreshments and entertainment.
The crowd was officially estimated to be in excess of 3,000 - but it sure seemed like more than that to me. The venue was the historic Minnesota Depot in downtown Minneapolis, which was skirted on the outside with potted corn stalks and inside the 60,000 square foot area was dotted with comfortable seating around video screens where those attending could just relax and enjoy the food and refreshments while taking in some information about the various agriculture-related sponsors.
The best part of the event was that all segments of the food, agriculture and biofuels industries came together as one. Event sponsors included the corn and ethanol industries, as well as livestock, poultry and food processors. Everyone put their differences aside, both political and policy, for at least one evening to unite for agriculture. It was a beautiful thing.
Take a look at the on-line AgNite Photo Album for pictures from the event and see just how beautiful it was.
Reuters has posted a story this morning in which they report that Brazil has hired lawyers to look into the current US import tariff against Brazilian ethanol.
“Brazil’s Sugar Cane Industry Association hired lawyers to study the compatibility between the U.S. tariff and WTO rules. The collapse of the Doha Round of world trade talks in July made litigation against the United States more likely.
Amorim said the case could be presented in the next one or two months, depending on final consultations with producers and the government’s lawyers.”
“My reading is that we have a very strong case and so there is a good chance we will challenge,” Reuters reports Foreign Minister Celso Amorim said on Tuesday.
What will this possible litigation mean for the future of the domestic US ethanol industry? Leave your thoughts in the comments.