GoodFuels

Quick Shot

by Matt Hartwig on Sep 30, 2008

Not So Good Fuels?

Here at GoodFuels we like to keep the focus on the exciting events happening within the alternative fuels industry in the US and across the world.  In order to gain a more complete perspective, however, it’s important to provide some context and examples of other fuels that can be used for the purpose of comparison.

The New York Times brings us a couple of those examples this week.

In a piece by Clifford Krauss, the questions surrounding the use of Canadian tar sands to produce lower grade crude oil are becoming a larger part of the political discourse of our neighbors to the North.  As Mr. Krauss notes, “the country’s rapid expansion of oil sands development, a great emitter of greenhouse gases, has strangely escaped much political debate — even though it is a major reason why Canada cannot meet its Kyoto targets.

In a separate piece, Jad Mouawad of the NY Times notes the problems facing the development of oil shale, a process much like that used in the tar sands that superheats rock to extract oil.  Mr. Mouawad points out, “Critics also say shale production would emit four times more global warming pollution than producing conventional gasoline, and point to the environmental damage caused in Canada by producing oil from tar sands. The Natural Resources Defense Council calls it ‘the dirtiest fuel on the planet.’”

Thanks to the folks at the Times’ new blog, Green, Inc., for pulling these pieces together.

Add This Permalink Comments | 1

POET in Motion

Apparently POET is too busy building and opening ethanol plants to read the headlines and know that the financial world as we know it is coming to an end.

POETThe world’s biggest ethanol producer just keeps getting bigger, opening a new plant today in Fostoria, Ohio and announcing another plant opening in the same state at the end of October.

In fact, POET may be looking to get even bigger through acquisitions, according to this story from the Ottawa Citizen, which quotes CEO Jeff Broin saying that the financial crunch has made it the best time “in at least five years” to do so.

Obviously, he has not heard that the financial crisis “may delay biofuels development,” as Reuters reported this week from an interview with the CEO of BlueFire Ethanol. The fear is that the crisis will stifle cellulosic ethanol development because it has “raised project finance costs and made ambitious targets to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources look less achievable.” Just last month, POET announced they would complete construction on a $4 million pilot-scale cellulosic ethanol production facility by the end of this year and Jeff Broin said he is “more confident about the future of cellulosic ethanol than ever before.”

Some ethanol producers have been affected by bad financial decisions lately, no question. But, with corn prices heading back down (futures dropped below $5 today), those who are the most fiscally responsible will continue to turn a profit and keep moving forward. I’m no economist, but it seems that one of the best solutions to our financial problems is to invest even more into domestic, renewable sources of energy that produce jobs and keep more American dollars here at home rather than sending them overseas.

Add This Permalink Comments | 0

Clean Energy

by Jackie Helling on Sep 29, 2008

NSF’s plan for biofuel development center

The Argus Leader ran a story this morning on the National Science Foundation’s plans to create a Center for Bioenergy and Development at South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, along with the support of several other universities, including Kansas State University and North Carolina State University.

The goal of the center, says the Leader, is to refine current biofuel technology while researching and developing next-generation ethanol.

“South Dakota has a long track record of leadership in biofuels, dating back to the late 1970s, when we operated the first corn ethanol research facility,” SDSU professor Bill Gibbons told the Leader. “The Research in the  CenterBioenergy will focus on creating similar breakthroughs in converting lignocellulosic biomass into ethanol.”

The membership fee ranges from $20,000 to $50,000, and each university is required to recruit five governmental or industry companies to the center.

 Check out the Leader’s website here for more details.  

Add This Permalink Comments | 0

Fair Reporting

by Cindy Zimmerman on Sep 28, 2008

Good Fuel in Maryland

Here’s a great story about ethanol in Maryland from the Baltimore Sun, written by Ted Shelsby “On the farm.” I didn’t even know they still had farm reporters for newspapers in major metro areas on the east coast!

The story talks about the opening of E85 pumps in Maryland at stations in Rockville, Frederick, Takoma Park and Germantown. It quotes Lynne Hoot, executive director of the Maryland Grain Producers Association, as saying that E-85 was not only putting more money in the pockets of motorists, it was also helping farmers pay their bills.

Martin O'MalleyIt also quotes Maryland Governor Martin O’Malley from a press conference he held last month announcing the four new E85 stations. In a press release from that announcement, O’Malley said, “With these new E-85 facilities, we’ll continue to make Maryland’s transportation fleet less dependent on fossil fuels, strengthening the energy future of our State for generations to come. These upfront investments in our alternative fuel infrastructure position Maryland to take advantage of the rapid advances in the next generation of non-food-based ethanol while reducing greenhouse gas emissions.”

It’s very important to notice that he made the point that investing in first generation ethanol will help advance the next generation of the fuel. That shows great foresight that some other governors could use - like maybe Rick Perry of Texas?

It’s also important to note that Maryland is a pretty big poultry producing state and there are no quotes in the article from poultry producers complaining about ethanol production, which is interesting, but it does point out that ethanol has helped increase grain prices for farmers in Maryland and lower gas prices for consumers. Unusually one-sided reporting in favor of ethanol - kind of refreshing!

Add This Permalink Comments | 0

Feed AND fuel

The Renewable Fuels Association has released a paper on the ethanol co-product distillers grains, proving once again that this nation’s ethanol producers are capable of feeding and renewably fueling this nation simultaneously.

When ethanol is produced, only 2/3 of the bushel of corn is used. The remaining third of the bushel goes back into the markets as a nutrient rich livestock feed.

America’s ethanol producers delivered 23 million metric tons of distillers grains last year, “roughly equivalent to the combined total amount of feed consumed by cattle on feed last year in Texas, Kansas, Nebraska, and Colorado-the nation’s four largest feedlot states.”

The report is available on the RFA website.

Add This Permalink Comments | 0