GoodFuels

Liberty from Foreign Oil

As the Statue of Liberty’s crown reopens to the public this Independence Day for the first time since September 11, 2001, it’s a good time to consider what true liberty and independence means. To paraphrase the famous quote from one of our founding fathers, Patrick Henry, “Give me liberty or give me foreign oil.”

Jay Hakes, author of “A Declaration of Energy Independence,” says September 11, 2001 was a preview of America’s future — one possible future.

On September 12, 2001 the United States awakened from a nightmare, finding itself standing at a crossroad, facing a choice between two very different futures: One choice would lead the country to increased dependence on foreign oil and a future dominated by terrorism and war. The other choice would lead to American energy independence and a world economy that is no longer desperate for oil.

On the main page of Hakes’ website “American Energy Independence,” there are photos of two paintings by artist Michael D’Antuono.

“The first painting titled “Dependence” depicts a burqa-clad Statue of Liberty encircled by vultures in an apocalyptic environment clinging to a barrel of oil instead of a book and a gasoline nozzle raised above her head in place of her torch.

The second piece titled “Independence”, offers an optimistic alternative to the first with our Miss Liberty this time embracing a solar panel and wind turbine as eagles and doves glide through an idyllic blue sky.”

Hakes has a great way of thinking about Energy Independence we should all consider as we fill up our cars and prepare to watch the fireworks bursting in air this holiday:

Energy Independence is a civilization changing idea, like freedom, one that should be thought of much like we think of our national independence—our liberty, which is both an ideal and a physical reality. Energy Independence can and should be pursued with the same patriotic spirit that fought for, won and sustains American democracy and freedom.

The phrase “Energy Independence” is a slogan embodying an idea that resonates with the character of America—it is a call for return to economic balance and protection from vulnerability created by over-dependence on petroleum to fuel our cars, trucks and airplanes—it is a public outcry voiced by citizens demanding government leadership in energy production, distribution, security and fuel choice.

God Bless America!

Impact of ethanol on farmers

Via Daily Finance:

In an interview with farmer Brent Porteus, past president of the Ohio Corn Growers Association, Daily Finance discusses the corn market and “prospects for the future”.

When asked how ethanol impacted his farming operation in the past year, Porteus has this to say:

“The impact of ethanol is not as great as many people believe. It’s still only a part of the market — last year, three billion bushels. Sixty percent of our corn production is used to feed livestock, while over two billion bushes went to export last year, up 6 percent. Last summer, China was buying commodities, since they were a bargain due to the weak dollar. The spike in grain prices occurred when oil prices went up and the stock market declined, and money looking for a safe haven flowed into commodities. This ‘perfect storm’ was what drove prices up steeply for a couple of months. It wasn’t a corn problem; it was an energy problem.”

As for the food vs fuel debate, he believes that this country’s farmers will be able to renewable fuel and feed the country at the same time:

Porteus points to the dramatic increase in our nation’s yield per acre over the past 30 years. In 1978, the U.S. corn harvest was about 6.3 billion bushels; in 2008, 12.1 billion. He believes that, with new planting technology and improvements in the corn stock, farmers will be able to increase their yields to serve the ethanol industry without driving up food prices. Also, as the USDA points out, only 19 percent of our food cost comes from the cost of grains and seed oils.

Interesting interview. Read the whole thing here.

Photo courtesy of rsgreen89.